Consolidated Text Prepared for
Public Release
Anti-Counterfeiting
Trade Agreement
PUBLIC
Predecisional/Deliberative Draft:
April
2010
This
draft text does not identify participants'
positions in respect of square bracketed options.
CHAPTER ONE
INITIAL PROVISIONS AND
DEFINITIONS
Section A: Initial Provisions 1
ARTICLE 1.1: RELATION TO OTHER
AGREEMENTS
Nothing
in this Agreement shall derogate from any
international obligation of a Party with respect
to any other Party under existing agreements to
which both Parties are party.
ARTICLE
1.2: NATURE AND SCOPE OF OBLIGATIONS2
1. Members shall give
effect to the provisions of this Agreement. A
Party may implement in its domestic law more
extensive protection and enforcement of
intellectual property rights than is required by
this Agreement, provided that such protection and
enforcement does not contravene the provisions of
this Agreement. Members shall be free to
determine the appropriate method of implementing
the provisions of this Agreement within their own
legal system and practice.
2.
Nothing in this Agreement creates any obligation
with respect to the distribution of resources as
between enforcement of intellectual property
rights and enforcement of law in general.
ARTICLE
1.3: RELATION TO STANDARDS CONCERNING
AVAILABILITY AND SCOPE OF
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY RIGHTS
1.
This Agreement shall be without prejudice to
provisions governing the availability,
acquisition, scope, and maintenance of
intellectual property rights contained in a
Party's law.
2.
It is understood that this Agreement does not
create any obligation on a Party to apply
measures where a right in intellectual property
is not protected under the laws and regulations
of that Party.
ARTICLE
1.4: PRIVACY AND DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
[A
suitable provision needs to be drafted that would
ensure nothing in the Agreement detracts from
national legislation regarding protection of
personal privacy. In the same way, a suitable
provision needs to be drafted regarding
disclosure of commercial information]
Section B3:
General Definitions
ARTICLE
1.X: DEFINITIONS
For
purposes of this Agreement, unless otherwise
specified:
days
means calendar days;
intellectual
property refers to all categories of
intellectual property that are the subject of
Sections 1 through 7 of Part II of the Agreement
on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property
Rights.
Council
means the ACTA Oversight Council established
under Chapter Five;
measure
includes any law, regulation, procedure,
requirement, or practice;
person
means either a natural person or a juridical
person;
right
holder includes a federation or an
association having the legal standing and
authority to assert rights in intellectual
property, and also includes a person that
exclusively has any one or more of the
intellectual property rights encompassed in a
given intellectual property;
territory
means customs territory of a Party and all free
trade zones of that Party;
TRIPS
Agreement means the Agreement on
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property
Rights, contained in Annex 1C to the WTO
Agreement; 4
WTO
means the World Trade Organization; and
WTO
Agreement means the Marrakesh Agreement
Establishing the World Trade Organization,
done on April 15, 1994.
CHAPTER TWO
LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ENFORCEMENT
OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
General Obligations5
ARTICLE
2.X: GENERAL OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO
ENFORCEMENT
1.
Procedures adopted, maintained, or applied to
implement this Chapter shall be fair and
equitable. They shall not be unnecessarily
complicated or costly, or entail unreasonable
time-limits or unwarranted delays.
2.
In respect of civil remedies and criminal
penalties for enforcement of intellectual
property rights, each Party shall take into
account the need for proportionality between the
seriousness of the infringement and the remedies
or penalties ordered.
[3.
Those measures, procedures and remedies shall
also be [effective, proportionate][ fair and
equitable] and [deterrent]]6 ]
4.
[Provision on limitations on remedies available
against use by governments as well as exemptions
of public authorities and official from liability
to be inserted here at a later date.]
5.
[Define scope of the intellectual property rights
covered in the Agreement]] [The scope of
intellectual property rights will be defined at
the start of each chapter.]
Section 1: Civil Enforcement
ARTICLE
2.1: AVAILABILITY OF CIVIL PROCEDURES
In
the context of this section, e] [E]ach Party
shall make available to right holders [civil
judicial] [or administrative] procedures
concerning the enforcement of any [intellectual
property right] [copyrights and related rights
and trademarks].
ARTICLE
2.X: INJUNCTIONS
[1.
]In civil judicial proceedings concerning the
enforcement of [copyright or related rights and
trademarks] [intellectual property rights], each
Party shall provide that its judicial authorities
shall have the authority [subject to any
statutory limitations under its domestic law] to
issue [against the infringer an injunction aimed
at prohibiting the continuation of the] [an order
to a party to desist from an] infringement,
including an order to prevent infringing goods
from entering into the channels of commerce [and
to prevent their exportation].7
[2.
The Parties [may] shall also ensure that right
holders are in a position to apply for an
injunction against [infringing] intermediaries
whose services are used by a third party to
infringe an intellectual property right.8
]9
ARTICLE
2.2: DAMAGES
1.
Each Party shall provide that:
(a)
in civil judicial proceedings, its judicial
authorities shall have the authority to order the
infringer [who knowingly or with reasonable
grounds to know, engaged in [infringing activity]
of [copyright or related rights and trademarks]
[intellectual property rights] to pay the right
holder
(i)
damages adequate to compensate for the injury the
right holder has suffered as a result of the
infringement; or
(ii)
[at least in the case of copyright or related
rights infringement and trademark
counterfeiting,] [in the case of IPR
infringements] the profits of the infringer that
are attributable to the infringement, [which may
be presumed to be the amount of damages] [and
that are not taken into account in computing the
amount of damages] [referred to in clause (i)]10
[which
may be presumed to be the amount of damages
referred to in clause (i)]; and
(b)
in determining the amount of damages for
[copyright or related rights infringement and
trademark counterfeiting] [infringement of
intellectual property rights], its judicial
authorities shall consider, inter alia,
any legitimate measure of value submitted by the
right holder, which may include the lost profits,
the value of the infringed good or service,
measured by the market price, the suggested
retail price, or [the profits of the infringer
that are attributable to the infringement].
[2.
At least with respect to works, phonograms, and
performances protected by copyright or related
rights, and in [cases of trademark
counterfeiting], in civil judicial proceedings,
[As an alternative to paragraph 1,] each Party
[shall][may] establish or maintain a system that
provides:
(a)
pre-established damages;
(b)
presumptions for determining the amount of
damages11 sufficient to compensate the
right holder for the harm caused by the
infringement.12 [; or
(c)
additional damages]]
[3.
Where the infringer did not knowingly, or with
reasonable grounds to know, engage in infringing
activity, each Party may [lay down that]
[establish] [may authorize its] the judicial
authorities may [to] order the recovery of
profits or the payment of damages, which may be
pre-established.]
[4.
Where a Party provides one of the options
described in paragraph 2(a) or 2(b), that Party
shall ensure that a right holder has the right to
choose that option [13] as an
alternative to the remedies referred to in
paragraph 1.]
Option
1
[5.
Each Party shall provide that its judicial
authorities, except in exceptional circumstances,
shall have the authority to order, at the
conclusion of civil judicial proceedings [[at
least in cases] concerning copyright or related
rights infringement, [patent infringement,] or
trademark infringement] that the prevailing party
be awarded payment by the losing party of [
[reasonable and proportionate] legal] court costs
or fees. [Each Party shall also provide that its
judicial authorities, [except in exceptional
circumstances], [in proceedings concerning
copyright or related rights infringement or
willful trademark counterfeiting,] shall have the
authority to order, [in appropriate cases], that
the prevailing party be awarded payment by the
losing party of reasonable attorney's fees [, and
other expenses as provided for under that Party's
domestic law].14 ]
Option
2
[5.
Each Party shall provide that its judicial
authorities, [in appropriate cases], shall have
the authority to order, at the conclusion of
civil judicial proceedings [[at least in cases]
concerning copyright or related rights
infringement, [patent infringement,] or trademark
counterfeiting] that the prevailing party be
awarded payment by the losing party of court
costs or fees and reasonable [and proportionate]
attorney's fees [, and any other expenses as
provided for under that Party's domestic law].15
]
ARTICLE
2.3: OTHER REMEDIES
1.
With respect to goods that have been found to be
[pirated or counterfeited] [infringing an
intellectual property right], each Party shall
provide that in civil judicial proceedings, at
the right holder's request, its judicial
authorities shall have the authority to order
that such goods be [recalled, definitively
removed from the channel of commerce, or]
destroyed, except in exceptional circumstances,
without compensation of any sort.
2.
Each Party shall further provide that its
judicial authorities shall have the authority to
order that materials and implements the
predominant use of which has been in the
manufacture or creation of [infringing] [pirated
or counterfeit] goods be, without undue delay and
without compensation of any sort, destroyed or
disposed of outside the channels of commerce in
such a manner as to minimize the risks of further
infringements.
[3.
The judicial authorities shall order that those
remedies be carried out at the expense of the
infringer, unless particular reasons are invoked
for not doing so.]
[4.
[In ordering those remedies, the judicial
authorities][Each Party shall further provide
that its judicial authority in ordering these
remedies] shall take into account the need for
proportionality between the seriousness of the
infringement and the remedies ordered as well as
the interest of third parties.]16
ARTICLE
2.4: INFORMATION RELATED TO INFRINGEMENT
[Without
prejudice to other statutory provisions which, in
particular, govern the protection of
confidentiality of information sources or the
processing of personal data,]17 Each
Party shall provide that in civil judicial
proceedings concerning the enforcement of
[intellectual property rights][copyright or
related rights and trademarks], its judicial
authorities shall have the authority upon a
justified request of the right holder, to order
the [alleged] infringer [including an alleged
infringer] to provide, [for the purpose of
collecting evidence] any [relevant] information
[information on the origin and distribution
network of the infringing goods or services][in
the form as prescribed in its applicable laws and
regulations] that the infringer possesses or
controls, [where appropriate,] to the right
holder or to the judicial authorities. Such
information may include information regarding any
person or persons involved in any aspect of the
infringement and regarding the means of
production or distribution channel of such goods
or services, including the identification of
third persons involved in the production and
distribution of the infringing goods or services
or in their channels of distribution. [For
greater clarity, this provision does not apply to
the extent that it would conflict with common law
or statutory privileges, such as legal
professional privilege.] ]
ARTICLE
2.5: PROVISIONAL MEASURES
[X.
Each Party shall provide that its judicial
authorities shall have the authority, at the
request of the applicant, to issue an
interlocutory injunction intended to prevent any
imminent infringement of an intellectual property
right [copyright or related rights or trademark].
An interlocutory injunction may also be issued,
under the same conditions, against an
[infringing] intermediary whose services are
being used by a third party to infringe an
intellectual property right. Each Party shall
also provide that provisional measures may be
issued, even before the commencement of
proceedings on the merits, to preserve relevant
evidence in respect of the alleged infringement.
Such measures may include inter alia the
detailed description, the taking of samples or
the physical seizure of documents or of the
infringing goods.]
1.
Each Party shall [provide][ensure] that its
judicial authorities [shall ]act [expeditiously][
on requests] for provisional measures inaudita
altera parte, and shall endeavor to make a
decision[ on such requests] without undue delay,
except in exceptional cases.
2.
[In civil judicial proceedings concerning
copyright or related rights infringement and
trademark counterfeiting18 ], each
Party shall provide that its judicial authorities
shall have the authority to order the seizure or
other taking into custody of suspected infringing
goods, materials, and implements relevant to the
act of infringement [and, at least for trademark
counterfeiting, documentary evidence relevant to
the infringement].
[3.
Each Party shall provide that its
[judicial][competent] authorities have the
authority to require the plaintiff, with respect
to provisional measures, to provide any
reasonably available evidence in order to satisfy
themselves with a sufficient degree of certainty
that the plaintiff's right is being infringed or
that such infringement is imminent, and to order
the plaintiff to provide a reasonable security or
equivalent assurance [set at a level sufficient]
to protect the defendant [, ensuring compensation
for any prejudice suffered when the measure is
revoked or lapses due to any reason, ]and to
prevent abuse. [Such security or equivalent
assurance shall not unreasonably deter recourse
to such procedures].
Section 2: Border Measures19
[20 ] [21
]
[ARTICLE
2.X: SCOPE OF THE BORDER MEASURES
1.
This section sets out the conditions for action
by the competent authorities when goods are
suspected of infringing intellectual property
rights, within the meaning of this agreement,
when they are imported, exported, in-transit or
in other situations where the goods are under
customs supervision.
2.
For the purposes of this section, "goods
infringing an intellectual property right"
means goods infringing any of the intellectual
property rights covered by TRIPS22.
However, Parties may decide to exclude from the
scope of this section, certain rights other than
trade marks, copyrights and GIs when [not
protected exclusively by copyright and trade mark
systems and] [protected by [non-product- or
sector-specific] [registration] sui generis
systems.]
3.
[Parties shall provide for the provisions related
to border measures to be applied [at least ]in
cases of trade mark counterfeiting and copyright
piracy. [Parties may provide for such provisions
to be applied in other cases of infringement of
intellectual property rights.]]
ARTICLE
2.X: DE MINIMIS PROVISION
Parties
may exclude from the application of this Section
small quantities of goods of a non-commercial
nature contained in travelers' personal luggage
[or sent in small consignments.]
ARTICLE
2.X: PROVISION OF INFORMATION FROM THE RIGHT
HOLDER
Each
Party shall permit the competent authorities to
request a right holder to supply relevant
information to assist the competent authorities
in taking border measures provided for under this
Section. Each Party may also allow a right holder
to supply relevant information to the competent
authorities.
ARTICLE
2.6: APPLICATION BY RIGHT HOLDER
Option
1
1.
Each Party shall provide procedures for import
[and in-transit23 ] shipments and
[may] [shall] provide procedures for export
shipments, by which right holders may request the
competent authorities to suspend release 24
of suspected counterfeit trademark goods25
and suspected pirated copyright goods26
[goods suspected of infringing an intellectual
property right]into free circulation.
Option
2
[1.
Each Party shall provide procedures by which
right holders may request the competent
authorities to suspend the release of goods
suspected of infringing intellectual property
rights.]
2.
The competent authorities shall require a right
holder requesting the procedures described in
paragraph 1 to provide adequate evidence to
satisfy themselves that, under the laws of the
Party providing the procedures, there is prima
facie an infringement of the right holder's
intellectual property right and to supply
sufficient information that may reasonably be
expected to be within the right holder's
knowledge to make the suspected infringing goods
reasonably recognizable by the competent
authorities. The requirement to provide
sufficient information shall not unreasonably
deter recourse to the procedures described in
paragraph 1.
3.
Each Party shall provide for applications to
suspend the release of suspected infringing goods
that apply to all goods27 under
customs control in its territory and remain
applicable to multiple [or in the alternative
specified] shipments. Each Party may provide
that, at the request of the right holder, the
application to suspend the release of goods may
apply to selected points of entry and exit under
customs control. These applications for
suspension shall remain applicable for a period
of not less than [one year][or sixty days] from
the date of application, or the period of
protection of the relevant intellectual property
rights under the laws of the Party providing
border measures under this Section, whichever is
shorter. Each Party may permit a right holder to
specify that an application to suspend remain
applicable for a period of less than [one
year][or sixty days].
4.
The competent authorities shall inform the
applicant within a reasonable period whether they
have accepted the application. Where the
competent authorities have accepted the
application, they shall also make known to the
applicant the period of validity of the
application.
5.
Each Party may provide, where the applicant has
abused the process, or where there is due cause,
that an application may be denied, suspended, or
voided.
ARTICLE
2.7: EX-OFFICIO ACTION
Option 1
1.
Each Party [may] [shall] provide that its customs
authorities may act upon their own initiative, to
suspend the release of suspected counterfeit
trademark goods or suspected pirated copyright
goods with respect to imported, [exported] [, or
in-transit] goods including suspected counterfeit
trademark goods or suspected pirated copyright
goods admitted to, withdrawn from, or located in
free trade zones [goods suspected of infringing
an intellectual property right]. [Each Party
[may][shall endeavor to] provide its customs
authorities the same authority as the foregoing
provision of this Article in respect of [exported
and] in-transit goods that are [suspected
counterfeit trademark goods or suspected pirated
copyright goods.]
Option
2
[1.
Each Party shall provide that its competent
authorities may act upon their own initiative, to
suspend the release of goods suspected of
infringing an intellectual property right.]
2.
[Each Party may also provide that its customs
authorities may act, upon their own initiative,
to suspend the release of goods suspected of
infringing other intellectual property rights [,
not covered by this section].]
ARTICLE
2.X:
[As
an alternative to procedures in Article 2.6.1 and
2.7.1 relating to export or in-transit shipments,
each Party shall provide that where shipments are
exported from that Party, or shipments are
in-transit through that Party, it shall cooperate
to provide all available information to the
destination Party, upon request of the
destination Party, to enable effective
enforcement against shipments of infringing28
goods.]
ARTICLE
2.9: SECURITY OR EQUIVALENT ASSURANCE
Each
Party shall provide that its competent
authorities shall have the authority to require a
right holder requesting procedures described
under Article 2.6 to provide a reasonable
security or equivalent assurance sufficient to
protect the defendant and the competent
authorities and to prevent abuse. Each Party
shall provide that such security or equivalent
assurance shall not unreasonably deter recourse
to these procedures. Each Party may provide that
such security may be in the form of a bond
conditioned to hold the defendant harmless from
any loss or damage resulting from any suspension
of the release of the goods in the event the
competent authorities determine that the good [is
not a counterfeit trademark good or a pirated
copyright good] [does not infringe intellectual
property rights covered by this section]. Only in
exceptional circumstances [or pursuant to a
judicial order] may a Party permit a defendant to
post a bond or other security to obtain
possession of suspected counterfeit trademark
goods or suspected pirated copyright goods.
ARTICLE
2.10: DETERMINATION AS TO INFRINGEMENT
Each
Party shall adopt or maintain a procedure by
which competent authorities may determine, within
a reasonable period of time after the initiation
of the procedures described under Article 2.X or
2.X, whether the suspected infringing goods
infringe an intellectual property right29.
ARTICLE
2.11: REMEDIES
1.
Each Party shall provide its competent
authorities with the authority to order the
destruction of goods following a determination
under Article 2.10 that the goods are infringing30.
[In cases where such goods are not destroyed,
each Party shall ensure such goods are disposed
of outside the channels of commerce in such a
manner as to avoid any harm to the right holder.]
[or that they be disposed of outside the channels
of commerce in such a way as to preclude injury
to the right holder, except in exceptional
circumstances.]
2.
In regard to counterfeit trademark goods, the
simple removal of the trademark unlawfully
affixed shall not be sufficient, other than in
exceptional cases, to permit the release of goods
into the channels of commerce.
3.
Each Party may provide its competent authorities
with the authority to impose administrative
penalties following a determination under Article
2.10 that the goods are infringing.
ARTICLE
2.12: FEES 31
1.
Each Party shall provide that any application
fee, storage fee, or destruction fee to be
assessed by competent authorities in connection
with procedures described in this Section shall
not be used to unreasonably deter recourse to
these procedures.
ARTICLE
2.13: DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
Without
prejudice to a Party's laws pertaining to the
privacy or confidentiality of information:
- (a) Each Party may
authorize its competent authorities to
provide right holders with information
about specific shipments of goods,
including the description and quantity,
to assist in the detection of infringing
goods;
- (b) Each Party may
authorize its competent authorities to
provide right holders with information
about goods including, but not limited
to, the description and quantity of the
goods and the name and address of the
consignor, importer, exporter or
consignee, and, if known, the country of
origin and name and address of the
manufacturer of the goods to assist in
the determination under Article 2.10 of
whether goods infringe rights covered by
this Section;
- (c) Unless a Party has
granted authority under subparagraph (b),
at least in the case of imported goods,
where competent authorities have seized
or, in the alternative, made a
determination under Article 2.10 that
goods infringe rights covered by the
section, each Party shall authorize its
competent authorities to provide right
holders within 30 days32 of
seizure or determination, with
information about goods including, but
not limited to, the description and
quantity of the goods and the name and
address of the consignor, importer,
exporter, or consignee, and, if known,
the country of origin and name and
address of the manufacturer of the goods.33
[Article
2.X: LIABILITY OF THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES
[1.
With respect to the border measures covered by
this Section, each Party shall provide measures
concerning the liability of competent authorities
in the execution of their duties.]
Option
1
2.
The acceptance of an application on its own shall
not entitle the right-holder to compensation in
the event that goods infringing an intellectual
property right [copyright, related rights and
trademarks]are not detected by [competent
authorities]a customs office and are released or
no action is taken to detain them.
Option
2
[2.
Each Party may limit remedies sought by a right
holder or other persons against a Party's
competent authorities as a result of mere
acceptance of an application under Article 2.[6],
where the competent authorities release, or fail
to detect, detain, or take action against or in
connection with, goods that may infringe [IPR]
covered by this Section.]
[3.
The competent authorities shall not be liable
towards the persons involved in the situations
referred to in Article 2.6 for damages suffered
by them as a result of the authority's
intervention, except where provided for by the
law of the Party in which the application is made
or in which the loss or damage is incurred.]]
Section 3: Criminal Enforcement34
ARTICLE
2.14: CRIMINAL OFFENSES
1.35
Each Party shall provide for criminal procedures
and penalties to be applied at least in cases of
willful trademark counterfeiting or copyright or
related rights piracy on a commercial scale.36
Willful copyright or related rights piracy on a
commercial scale includes:
[(a)
significant willful copyright or related rights
infringements that have no direct or indirect
motivation of financial gain; and
(b)
willful copyright or related rights infringements
for purposes of commercial advantage or financial
gain.37]
[2.
Each Party shall provide for criminal procedures
and penalties to be applied in cases of
[willful], [unauthorized] [importation] and [or]
[domestic] [trafficking] [conducted] [use in the
course of trade] [on a commercial scale] of
labels [or packaging],
(a)
to which a mark has been applied [without consent
of the right holder] which is identical to or
cannot be distinguished [in its essential
aspects] from a trademark registered in [its
territory] [the Party in respect of certain goods
or services], and
(b)
which are intended to be used [by the importer or
user or, by a third party with the knowledge of
the importer or user, for willful trademark
counterfeiting] [on [either] the goods or [in
relation to] services [for which is registered]
[which are identical to goods or services for
which the trademark is registered.]
[3.
Each Party shall provide for criminal procedures
and penalties to be applied [in accordance with
its laws and regulations,] against any person
who, without authorization of the holder of
copyright [or related rights] [or the theatre
manager] in a [motion picture or other
audiovisual work], [cinematographic work]
[knowingly] [uses an audiovisual recording device
to transmit or make] [makes] a copy of [, or
transmits to the public] the motion picture or
other audiovisual work, or any part thereof, from
a performance of the motion picture or other
audiovisual work in a motion picture exhibition
facility open to the public.]38
ARTICLE
2.15: [CRIMINAL] LIABILITY AND PENALTIES [AND
SANCTIONS]
[1.
Liability of Legal Persons
(a)
Each Party shall adopt such measures as may be
necessary, consistent with its legal principles,
to establish the liability of legal persons for
the offences referred to in Article 2.14.
(b)
Subject to the legal principles of the Party, the
liability of legal persons may be criminal or
non-criminal.
(c)
Such liability shall be without prejudice to the
criminal liability of the natural persons who
have committed the criminal offences.]
[2.
Inciting, Aiding and Abetting
The
provisions of this section shall apply to
[inciting,] aiding and abetting the offences
referred to in Article 2.14.]]39
[3.
Penalties and Sanctions]
[(a)]
For the [ offences] crimes referred to in
[Article 2.14] [Article 2.14.1], each Party shall
provide [effective, proportionate and dissuasive]
penalties40 [. The available penalties
shall] that include imprisonment [as well as]
[and] monetary fines41 [sufficiently
high to provide a deterrent to future acts of
infringement, with a view to removing the
monetary incentive of the infringer].
[(b)
For legal persons held liable under Article
2.15.1, each Party shall provide for effective,
proportionate and dissuasive sanctions, including
monetary sanctions.]
[ARTICLE
2.16. SEIZURE, FORFEITURE[/CONFISCATION] AND
DESTRUCTION
[1.
Seizure]
(a)
In case of an offence referred to in Article 2.14
[.1], each Party shall provide that its competent
authorities shall have the authority to order
[authorise] [at least for serious offences] the
seizure of suspected counterfeit trademark goods
or pirated copyright [or related rights] goods,
any related materials and implements used in the
commission of the alleged offence, documentary
evidence relevant to the alleged offence and any
assets derived from, or obtained directly or
indirectly through the infringing activity [42].
(b)
Each Party shall, if a prerequisite for such an
order, according to its national law, is the
identification of the items, ensure that the
order need not determine the items that are
subject to seizure in more detail than necessary
to allow their identification for the purpose of
the seizure.] [Each Party shall provide that such
orders need not individually identify the items
that are subject to seizure, so long as they fall
within specified categories in the relevant
order.]
[2.
Forfeiture/Confiscation and Destruction]
(a)
For the offences referred to in Article 2.14[.1],
each Party shall provide that its competent
authorities shall have the authority to order
[confiscation/][forfeiture43 [and/]or]
destruction [where appropriate] of all
counterfeit trademark goods or pirated copyright
[or related right] goods, of materials and
implements [predominantly] used in the creation
of counterfeit trademark goods or pirated
copyright goods [or related rights goods], and
[at least for serious offences] [forfeiture to
the State] of the [any] assets derived from, or
obtained directly or indirectly, through the
infringing activity.
(b)
Each Party shall [provide that its competent
authorities shall have the authority to] ensure
that the counterfeit trademark goods and pirated
copyright [or related rights] goods that have
been [confiscated/] forfeited [to the state]
under this subparagraph shall, if not destroyed,
be disposed of outside the channels of commerce,
[under the condition that the goods are not
dangerous for the health and security of
persons.] [in such a manner as to avoid any harm
caused to the right holder.]
(c)
Each Party shall further ensure that
[confiscation/]forfeiture and destruction under
this subparagraph shall occur without
compensation of any kind to the defendant.
(d)
Each Party may provide that its judicial
authorities have the authority to order the
confiscation/ forfeiture [to the state] of assets
the value of which corresponds to that of such
assets derived from or obtained directly or
indirectly through the infringing activity.
ARTICLE
2.17: EX OFFICIO CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT
Each
Party shall provide that its competent
authorities may act upon their own initiative to
initiate investigation [or] [and/or] legal action
with respect to the [criminal] offenses described
in [Article 2.14] [Sections 3 and 4.] [at least
in cases of significant public interest, in
accordance with national law.]
[ARTICLE 2.X. RIGHTS OF THE
DEFENDANT AND THIRD PARTIES
Each
Party shall ensure that the rights of the
[defendants and] third parties shall be duly
protected and guaranteed.]44
Section 4: [Special Measures
Related to Technological Enforcement of
Intellectual Property in the Digital Environment]
ARTICLE
2.18 [ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES IN THE
DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT]45
1.
Each Party shall ensure that enforcement
procedures, to the extent set forth in the civil
and criminal enforcement sections of this
Agreement, are available under its law so as to
permit effective action against an act of
[trademark, copyright or related
rights][intellectual property rights]
infringement which takes place [by means of the
Internet][in the digital environment] , including
expeditious remedies to prevent infringement and
remedies which constitute a deterrent to further
infringement.
2.
[Those measures, procedures and remedies shall
also be fair and proportionate.]46 *
3.
Without prejudice to the rights, limitations,
exceptions, or defenses to [[ patent, industrial
design, trademark and][copyright or related
rights]][intellectual property rights]
infringement available under its law, including
with respect to the issue of exhaustion of
rights, each Party [confirms that] [shall provide
for] [civil remedies as well as limitations,
exceptions, or defenses with respect to the
application of such remedies, are available in
its legal system in cases of third party
liability[47][or liability for those
who authorize infringement, or both] for
[[patent, industrial design, trademark
and][copyright or related rights]][intellectual
property rights] infringement.48
Option
1
[
3. Each Party recognizes that some persons49
use the services of third parties, including
online service providers,[50] for
engaging in [ patent, industrial design and
trademark,] copyright or related rights
infringement. Each Party also recognizes that
legal uncertainty with respect to application of
copyright and related rights, limitations,
exceptions, and defenses in the digital
environment may present barriers to the economic
growth of, and opportunities in, electronic
commerce.]51 Accordingly, in order to
facilitate the continued development of an
industry engaged in providing information
services online while also ensuring that measures
to take adequate and effective action against
copyright or related rights infringement are
available and reasonable each Party [shall][
may]:
- (a) provide limitations52
on the scope of civil remedies available
against an online service provider for
infringing activities that occur by
- (i) automatic
technical processes, and
- (ii) the actions
of the provider's users that are
not directed or initiated by that
provider and when the provider
does not select the material, and
- (iii) the provider
referring or linking users to an
online location,
when,
in cases of subparagraphs (ii) and (iii)53,
the provider does not have actual knowledge of
the infringement and is not aware of facts or
circumstances from which infringing activity is
apparent; and ]
Option
2
[Each
Party recognizes that some persons54
use the services of third parties, including
online service providers,[55] for
engaging in intellectual property rights
infringements.
(a)
In this respect, each Party shall provide
limitation on the [liability of] [ scope of civil
remedies available against an] on-line service
provider[s] for infringing activities56
that occur by57
(i)
automatic technical processes [ that keep the
provider from taking measures to prevent the
infringement], or
(ii)
the actions of the provider´s users that are not
initiated nor modified by that provided and when
the provider does not select the material or
(iii)
the storage of information provided by the
recipient of the service or at the request of the
recipient of the service,
when
exercising the activities as stipulated in
paragraph 3(a)(ii) and/or (iii) the online
service providers act [takes appropriate
measures] expeditiously, in accordance with
applicable law [s], [such as those] to remove or
disable access to infringing material or
infringing activity upon obtaining actual
knowledge of the infringement [or the fact that
the information at the initial source has been
removed or disabled.] [or having reasonable
grounds to know that the infringement is
occurring]]
Option
1
- (b) condition the
application of the provisions of
subparagraph (a) on meeting the following
requirements:
- (i) an online service
provider adopting and reasonably
implementing a policy[58] to
address the unauthorized storage or
transmission of materials protected by
copyright or related rights [ except that
no Party may condition the limitations in
subparagraph (a) on the online service
provider's monitoring its services or
affirmatively seeking facts indicating
that infringing activity is occurring];
and
- (ii) an online service
provider expeditiously removing or
disabling access to material or
[activity][alleged infringement], upon
receipt [of legally sufficient notice of
alleged infringement,][of an order from a
competent authority] and in the absence
of a legally sufficient response from the
relevant subscriber of the online service
provider indicating that the notice was
the result of mistake or
misidentification.
except
that the provisions of (ii) shall not be applied
to the extent that the online service provider is
acting solely as a conduit for transmissions
through its system or network.]
Option
2:
[Paragraph
3(a) shall not affect the possibility for a
judicial or administrative authority, in
accordance with the Parties legal system,
requiring the service provider to terminate or
prevent an infringement, nor does it affect the
possibility of the parties establishing
procedures governing the removal or disabling of
access to information
The
Parties shall not impose a general monitoring
requirement on providers when acting in
accordance with this paragraph 3.]
[
3 ter. Each Party shall enable right
holders, who have given effective notification to
an online service provider of materials that they
claim with valid reasons to be infringing their
copyright or related rights, to expeditiously
obtain from that provider information on the
identity of the relevant subscriber.
3
quater. Each Party shall promote the
development of mutually supportive relationships
between online service providers and right
holders to deal effectively with patent,
industrial design, trademark and copyright or
related rights infringement which takes place by
means of the Internet, including the
encouragement of establishing guidelines for the
actions which should be taken.]
[4.59
In order to provide adequate legal protection60
and effective legal remedies against the
circumvention of effective technological measures
that are used by authors, [performers or
producers of phonograms] [the right holder of any
copyright or related rights or owner of an
exclusive license61] in connection
with the exercise of their rights and that
restrict unauthorized acts in respect of their
works, [performances, and phonograms] [or other
subject matters specified under Article 14 of the
TRIPS Agreement], each Party shall provide for
civil remedies, [or] [as well as] criminal
penalties in appropriate cases of willful conduct
[62] , that apply to:
[Each
Party shall provide for adequate legal protection63
and effective legal remedies, in the form of
civil remedies or criminal penalties in
appropriate cases of willful conduct, against the
circumvention of effective technological measures
that are used by authors, performers or producers
or phonograms in connection with the exercise of
their rights and that restrict unauthorized acts
in respect of their works, performances, and
phonogram. These shall apply to:]
- (a) the unauthorized
circumvention of an effective
technological measure64 [that
controls access to a protected work,
performance, or phonogram]; and
- (b) the manufacture,
importation, or circulation of a
[technology], service, device, product,
[component, or part thereof, that is:
[marketed] or primarily designed or
produced for the purpose of circumventing
an effective technological measure; or
that has only a limited commercially
significant purpose or use other than
circumventing an effective technological
measure.]]
[5.
[4.2] Each Party shall provide [that a] [adequate
legal protection against a] violation of a
measure implementing paragraph (4) [is a separate
civil or criminal offense,] independent of any
infringement of copyright or related rights.65
]66
Option
1
[Further,
[each Party may adopt exceptions and limitations
to measures implementing paragraph 4 so long as
they do not significantly impair the adequacy of
legal protection of those measures or the
effectiveness of legal remedies for violations of
those measures.]67
Option
2
[
5. Each Party may provide for measures which
would safeguard the benefit of certain exceptions
and limitations to copyright and related rights,
in accordance with its legislation.]
[6.
[In order to] [Each Party shall] provide adequate
and effective legal remedies to protect [
electronic] rights management information[, e]
[
E]ach Party shall provide for civil remedies,
[or] [as well as] criminal penalties] in
appropriate cases of willful [68]
conduct, that apply to any person performing
[without authority] any of the following acts
knowing [or with respect to civil remedies having
reasonable grounds to know] that it will induce,
enable, facilitate, or conceal an infringement of
any copyright or related right:
- (a) to remove or alter any
[electronic] right management information69
- (b) to distribute, import
for distribution, broadcast, communicate,
or make available to the public copies of
works, [or other subject matters
specified under Article 14 of the TRIPS
Agreement] [performances, or phonograms],
knowing that [electronic]rights
management information has been removed
or altered without authority.]
[7.]
[6.2] Each Party may adopt [limitations or]
exceptions to the requirements of subparagraphs
(a) and (b) [of paragraph (6)] [so long as they
do not significantly impair the adequacy of legal
protection or effectiveness of legal remedies for
violations of those measures.]
CHAPTER THREE
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
ARTICLE 3.1: INTERNATIONAL
ENFORCEMENT COOPERATION
- 1. Each Party recognizes
that international [enforcement]
cooperation [is vital [ to realize
[fully] effective protection of
intellectual property rights] [ in order
to deal with the increasingly global
problem of the trade in counterfeit and
pirated goods]] [plays an important role
in the protection of copyright and
trademark rights]and should be
[undertaken] [encouraged] regardless of
the origin of the infringing goods or the
location [or nationality] of the right
holder [of the intellectual property
rights.
2.
In order to combat [intellectual property right
infringement, in particular,] trademark
counterfeiting and copyright piracy, each Party
shall promote [may, as it deems appropriate, ]
cooperation [measures, where appropriate,] among
the [relevant] competent authorities of the
Parties [concerned with] [responsible for]
enforcement of intellectual property rights. Such
[cooperation includes][ measures may include]
[cooperation shall include][may include] law
enforcement cooperation with respect to criminal
investigation or prosecution [concerning]
[relating to] the offences covered by this
Agreement and [border measures] [cooperation at
the border], [which may be conducted bilaterally
or multilaterally] Particular attention shall be
devoted to the circulation of IPR infringing
goods detrimental to the health and safety.]
3.
Each Party [shall][ may], consistent with the
[existing][domestic law and policy and the]
[international agreements and arrangements to
which such Party is a party], [conduct][
undertake] enforcement cooperation [foreseen]
[activities as provided] [international
cooperation as set out ] in this Chapter [,in
line with the international agreements and
arrangements to which such Party is a party.]
[Each Party may also conduct enforcement
cooperation or provide assistance to another
Party pursuant to other international agreements,
arrangements, and practices, and in accordance
with its domestic law and policies.]
[4.
Nothing in this Chapter and Chapter 4 shall
require any Party to disclose confidential
information which would be contrary to its laws,
regulations, policies, legal practices and
applicable international agreements and
arrangements, including laws protecting
investigative techniques, right of privacy or
confidential information for law enforcement, or
otherwise be contrary to public interest, or
would prejudice the legitimate commercial
interests of particular enterprises, public or
private.]
[4.
The Parties understand that obligations under
this Chapter and Chapter 4 are subject to the
domestic laws, policies, resource allocation and
law enforcement priorities of each Party.]
ARTICLE 3.2: INFORMATION SHARING
1.
[In order to ensure effective enforcement of the
provisions of this Agreement,] each Party
[[shall][ may] promote sharing or exchanging]
[may, as it deems appropriate, share or exchange
] with other Parties [of the following
information ][ as appropriate and mutually
agreed]:
(a)
information collected by the Party under
provisions of Chapter 4, including statistical
data and information on best practices including
those relating to[risk analysis] [risk
management]; and
(b)
information on [the] development [and
implementation] of legislative and regulatory
measures [of the] [by the] Party [related to the
protection and enforcement of intellectual
property rights].
For
this purpose, the Parties shall endeavour to
establish appropriate modalities including
holding of periodical meetings.
[Parties
shall endeavor to establish an observatory as a
tool for collecting information]
2.
Each Party shall ensure, as appropriate and
mutually agreed, [within the limits of [its]
national legislation][ consistent with its
domestic laws] , policies, [legal] practices, and
applicable [existing] international agreements
and arrangements, that its competent authorities
have the [ability] [authority] to provide the
competent authorities of any other [Parties][
Party], either on request or on its own
initiative, with information [[necessary to
ensure][ to facilitate][ to allow] a proper
application of laws concerning enforcement of
intellectual property rights and to prevent,
investigate, [and repress acts of intellectual
property right infringements][ or prosecute
infringement of Intellectual property rights ]
[related to the enforcement of intellectual
property rights].
ARTICLE 3.3: CAPACITY BUILDING AND
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
1.
[In order to facilitate the implementation of
this Agreement or the accession thereto,]
[Developed country] Parties shall [endeavour to]
provide, on request and on mutually agreed terms
and conditions, assistance in capacity building
and technical assistance[in improving enforcement
of intellectual property rights,] [focused on
initiatives to combat the trade in counterfeit
and pirated goods] in favour of developing
country Parties to this Agreement and [, where
appropriate,] [for third countries ][for
countries not a Party to this Agreement.][
Parties shall make all reasonable efforts to
ensure that such capacity building and technical
assistance are compatible and do not overlap with
similar activities provided by international
organizations active in the field of intellectual
property.] [The provision of assistance under
this Article and Articles 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 is
subject to the availability of resources on the
part of the donor Party.]
2.
For the purpose of paragraph 1, [developed
country]Parties shall [, at the request of
developing country Parties and on mutually agreed
terms and conditions, ] work closely with
[developing country] [other]Parties [and, where
appropriate, countries not a Party to this
Agreement or separate customs territories,] [to
enact] [implement and to ] or strengthen their
[domestic] [ national] legislation, as
appropriate, and assist them in improving their
national intellectual property law enforcement
capacities through sharing best practices
concerning intellectual property law enforcement
and providing relevant technical training for
enforcement officials.
3.
[[Developed country][Developed and developing
country] Parties] [Each Party] may undertake the
obligations under this Article in conjunction
with relevant private sector or international
organizations.
[4.
Parties shall put in place a special allocation
Fund to finance ACTA initiatives on capacity
building and technical assistance]
[5.
Parties shall, in the implementation and
administration of this Agreement, take into
account developing countries needs in the field
of financing and technical assistance. In this
respect, States Parties to the Agreement agree:
(a)
To support, developing countries efforts, for the
implementation of the Agreement and the
integration of anti-counterfeiting and
anti-hacking actions in national development
strategies. This assistance shall be designed to
help developing countries to harmonize their
laws, to carry out their obligations and to
exercise their rights as Members.
(b)
To ensure predictable and sustainable financing.
(c)
To promote coordination of technical assistance
activities with the bilateral donors, WTO
Secretariat, WIPO as well as with other relevant
international intergovernmental institutions.
(d)
States Parties shall review annually the
implementation of this Article].
[5.
State parties shall endeavour to provide
technical assistance in the following areas:
(a)
Promoting the culture of intellectual property.
(b)
Training professionals in charge of the
protection of the rightholders involved in the
protection of intellectual Property.
(c)
Capacity building and experience sharing among
institutions in charge of fighting counterfeiting
and piracy.
(d)
Tools for measuring the economic impact of
counterfeiting on the market and evaluating the
anti counterfeiting and anti-hacking actions.
(e)
Conducting joint operations at the regional and
international levels.
(f)
Enforcement of laws regarding fighting
counterfeiting and piracy trough the Internet.
Technical
assistance shall be extended to all other types
of actions facilitating the implementation and
the applicability of the ACTA Agreement].
CHAPTER FOUR
ENFORCEMENT PRACTICES
ARTICLE 4.1: ENFORCEMENT
EXPERTISE, INFORMATION AND DOMESTIC COORDINATION
1.
Each Party shall [[facilitate] [ encourage][as it
deems appropriate foster the] development of]
[develop] specialized expertise [of][in its]
competent authorities concerned with enforcement
of [intellectual property rights] [copyright and
trademark rights] , in order to [ensure]
[promote] effective enforcement of [intellectual
property rights] [copyright and trademark rights]
[One means of implementation is through
specialized law enforcement authorities for the
investigation and prosecution of cases concerning
the infringement of intellectual property
rights.]
2.
Each Party shall [promote collection and analysis
of] [endeavor to collect] statistical data and
other [relevant] information [, which such Party
determines is useful and relevant,] [concerning
infringement of intellectual property rights [
within its territory], especially] trade in
counterfeit trademark goods and pirated copyright
goods. Each Party shall [further] promote
collection of information on best practices to
prevent and combat [intellectual property right
infringement] [trademark counterfeiting and
copyright piracy].
3.
Each Party shall [, as it deems appropriate,] [,
as appropriate,] [endeavour to enhance]
[promote] internal coordination among, [and
facilitate joint actions by], [such Party's]
[the] competent authorities [concerned with ][
responsible for] enforcement of intellectual
property rights [through an appropriate
coordinating [ body][ bodies] or other relevant
mechanisms]
4.
[In order to promote effective enforcement of
intellectual property rights,] each Party shall
[, as it deems appropriate,] [endeavour to
encourage][ promote] [the] establishment and
maintenance of formal or informal mechanisms, [as
appropriate,] such as public and/or private
advisory groups, whereby competent authorities
may hear [the views of] right holders and other
relevant stakeholders [where appropriate] [foster
dialogue and information exchanges with
shareholders in its territory] .
ARTICLE 4.2: MANAGEMENT OF RISK AT
BORDER70
1.
Each Party shall adopt and maintain appropriate
measures that facilitate activities of custom
authorities for better identifying and targeting
for inspection at its border, shipments [that
[could] contain] [which are suspected to contain]
[counterfeit trademark goods or pirated copyright
goods] [goods infringing intellectual property
rights.] Such activities may include,[ subject to
paragraph 2 of Article 3.2] [clause in article
3.4. is applicable]:
- (a) contact with relevant
stakeholders and with relevant
authorities to identify and address
risks;
- (b) exchanging available
data with custom authorities of other
Parties regarding significant seizures of
[counterfeit and pirated] [infringing]
goods by customs, wherever possible; and
- (c) sharing information
with custom authorities of other Parties
on approaches that are developed to
provide greater effectiveness in
targeting shipments that could contain
[counterfeit and pirated] [infringing]
goods.
[2.
To better identify and target shipments for
inspection that are suspected to contain
counterfeit trademark goods or pirated copyright
goods, each Party may:
(a)
consult with relevant stakeholders and with
competent authorities responsible for
intellectual property rights enforcement to
identify and address significant risks and
promote actions to mitigate those risks;
(b)
when appropriate, exchange data with border
authorities of other Parties; and
(c)
share information with border authorities of
other Parties on approaches that are developed to
provide greater effectiveness in the border
enforcement of intellectual property rights,
including approaches for targeting shipments that
could contain counterfeit and pirated goods.
3.
Each Party shall provide that its competent
authorities may conduct audits of an importer's
business records, including methods of payment
and purchase contracts, as well as its internal
controls to track illicit financial gains and
expose business practices related to trademark
counterfeiting and copyright piracy.]
ARTICLE 4.3:
TRANSPARENCY/PUBLICATION OF ENFORCEMENT
PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES
Option 1
[1.
For the purpose of [further] promoting
transparency in the administration of [the]
intellectual property right enforcement system,
each Party shall take appropriate measures
[pursuant to domestic laws and policies,]
[available] to publish or make available to the
public information [within a reasonable period of
time] on:
(a)
procedures [available] regarding the enforcement
of intellectual property rights including
competent authorities for enforcement of
intellectual property rights and contact points
for assistance to right holders;
[(b)
relevant laws, regulations, [final judicial
decisions ] and administrative rulings of general
application pertaining to enforcement of
intellectual property rights;]
[(c)
applications [forms]for the suspension by the
competent authorities of the release of goods
[infringing intellectual property right]
[suspected counterfeit and pirated goods ] as a
border measure;] and
(d)
its efforts to ensure effective enforcement of
intellectual property rights and [an
effective][intellectual property protection
system] including any statistical data that the
Party may collect.]
Option 2
[1.
For the purpose of promoting transparency in the
administration of its intellectual property
rights enforcement system, each Party shall:
(a)
provide that final judicial decisions or
administrative rulings of general applicability
pertaining to the enforcement of intellectual
property rights shall be in writing and shall
state any relevant findings of fact and the
reasoning or the legal basis upon which the
decisions are based. Each Party shall also
provide that such decisions or rulings shall be
published71 , or otherwise
made publicly available, in a national language
in such a manner as to enable governments and
interested persons to become acquainted with
them.
(b)
identify in a manner readily available to the
public, the competent authorities for
intellectual property enforcement and contact
points where right holders may seek assistance;
(c)
[publish applications for the suspension by the
competent authorities of the release of suspected
counterfeit and pirated goods as a border
measure;] and
(d)
publicize information on its efforts to ensure
effective enforcement of intellectual property
rights in its domestic intellectual property
rights system, including any statistical
information that the Party may collect for such
purposes.72]
Option 1
[2.
Nothing in this [Chapter and Chapter 3][
Agreement] shall require any Party to disclose
{confidential} information which would impede the
enforcement of its laws and regulations,
including laws protecting investigative
techniques, right of privacy or confidential
information for law enforcement, or otherwise be
contrary to [its domestic laws or policy, or] the
public interest, or would prejudice the
legitimate commercial interests of particular
enterprises, public or private.
Option
2
[2.
Nothing in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall require
Members to disclose personal information, or
confidential information which would impede law
enforcement or otherwise be contrary to the
public interest or could prejudice the legitimate
commercial interests of particular enterprises,
public or private.]
[3.
In civil legal proceedings instituted for
infringement of an intellectual property right,
the judicial authorities may order, at the
request of the applicant and at the expense of
the infringer, appropriate measures for the
dissemination of the information concerning the
decision, including displaying the decision and
publishing it in full or in part. Parties may
apply this provision to other judicial and
administrative proceedings.]
ARTICLE 4.4: PUBLIC AWARENESS
Each
Party shall [take [necessary]
[such][appropriate]] [promote the adoption of
appropriate] measures [as it deems appropriate]
to enhance] [will promote] [including educational
projects, designed to raise] public awareness of
the importance of [the protection of ][
protecting] intellectual property rights and the
detrimental effects of intellectual property
right infringement, including educational [and
dissemination] projects. [Such measures may
include joint initiatives with the private
sector.]
[ARTICLE 4.5: DESTRUCTION OF
INFRINGING GOODS
In
cases where confiscated goods found to be
infringing intellectual property rights are to be
destroyed, Parties shall endeavour to take
environmental concerns into account when deciding
on the destruction method. ]
CHAPTER FIVE
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS73
ARTICLE
5.1: THE [OVERSIGHT] [STEERING] [COMMITTEE]
1.
The [Contracting] Parties [hereby establish][
[shall have a] the [Oversight][ACTA] [Steering]
Committee, comprising [[representatives of] [each
of] the Parties] [one delegate from each Party
who may be assisted by alternative delegates,
advisors and experts.]
2.
The Committee shall:
- (a) supervise the
implementation of this Agreement;
[including a periodic mutual evaluation
process of the implementation of the
Agreement by the parties, according to
the principles of equal treatment and a
fair hearing.]
- (b) [oversee [its][the]
[the Agreement's] further elaboration [or
development?] [of this Agreement], [deal
with matters concerning the amendment and
development of this Agreement] while
ensuring that such[elaboration][
development]does not duplicate other
international efforts regarding the
enforcement of intellectual property
rights;
- (c) [[resolve][facilitate
the avoidance of] disputes that may arise
regarding [its][the] interpretation or
application[74] [of this
Agreement]; ]and
- (d) consider any other
matter that may affect the operation of
this Agreement.
3.
The Committee may:
- (a) [establish,] [and
delegate [tasks] tasks/responsibilities]
to, ad hoc or standing committees working
groups or [Government] experts
groups;][to assist the Committee in
accomplishing its tasks;][a Task-Force to
undertake the monitoring and the
evaluation of the Agreement, namely by
reviewing the implementation of Parties'
obligations, as defined in Article
5.1.2.a) and assisting candidate
countries to join the Agreement. This
Task-Force should consist of experts
appointed by the Parties and agreed upon
by the Oversight Committee;]
- (b) seek the advice of
non-governmental persons or groups [from
the State Parties];
- (c) [make recommendations
regarding the implementation of the
Agreement [including endorsing best
practice guidelines for implementing the
Agreement, identifying and monitoring
techniques of piracy and counterfeiting
and their evolution]];
- (d) assist non-Party
governments in assessing the benefits of
accession to the Agreement [and share
information and best practices on
reducing IPR infringements];
- (e) [support international
organizations in the enforcement of
intellectual property rights;] and
- (f) take such other action
in the exercise of its functions as the
Parties may decide.
[4.
One-half of the members of the Committee shall
constitute a quorum.]
5.
The Committee shall [establish its rules and
procedures][ at its first meeting adopt its rules
of procedures] [including rules for the
convocation of extraordinary sessions]. All
decisions of the Committee shall be taken by
consensus, [except as the Committee may otherwise
decide [by consensus]]. [The working language of
the Committee shall be English.]
6.
The Committee shall convene [at least [once a
year]] [once every two years] [in regular
session]. [T]he Committee shall be chaired [and
hosted][ successively by each Party][by a
volunteering Party] [in English alphabetically] .
[assisted by a Vice-Chair from the Party due to
chair and host the subsequent meeting.] [A
Special session may be called for by one Party
and convened if the majority of the Parties does
not oppose such request. The Special session
shall be chaired by the Party chairing the
Regular session of that year. The Committee shall
preferably meet in Geneva.]
[7.
The Committee's role as set forth in Article 5.1
shall not include any oversight or supervision
relating to domestic or international criminal
investigations or enforcement of specific
intellectual property cases.]
ARTICLE
5.2: THE SECRETARIAT
1.
The Party that is the Chair of the Committee
shall provide the Secretariat to the Committee
for [the calendar year][the two calendar years
beginning with the calendar year [immediately
prior to that]] in which the Committee shall be
convened with that Party as Chair.
2.
The functions of the Secretariat shall be:
- (a) to provide assistance
to the Committee [as required, and];
- (b) [to provide
administrative support to the Chair][to
perform the administrative tasks
concerning this Agreement.]
- (c) [to elaborate all
documents resulted from ordinary or
extraordinary sessions]
- (d) [to submit documents
derived from ordinary or extraordinary
sessions to all parties]
ARTICLE
5.3: CONTACT POINTS
1.
[Each Party shall designate a [current] contact
point to facilitate communications [between the][
with other] Parties on any matter covered by this
Agreement.] [The][Each Party shall transmit the]
[name, [and][physical] address, telephone number
[and e-mail address]] of that contact point
[shall be transmitted] to the Depositary [prior
to the entry into force of the Agreement for that
Party], who shall circulate the information to
the Parties.
- 2. On the request of
[another][one] Party, the contact point
[of another Party] shall identify [the]
[according to the matter concerned, an
appropriate] office or official
[responsible for the matter concerned]
and assist, as necessary, in facilitating
communication between the [responsible]
office or official concerned with the
requesting Party.
[ARTICLE
5.4: TRANSPARENCY
Option 1
[1.
Each Party shall ensure that its laws,
regulations,[procedures] [final judicial
decisions], and administrative rulings of general
application respecting any matter covered by this
Agreement are promptly [in an appropriate time]
published or otherwise made publicly available
[in a national language,] in such a manner as to
enable governments and interested persons to
become acquainted with them.]
Option 2
[1.
Each Party shall ensure that final judicial
decisions or administrative rulings of general
applicability pertaining to the enforcement of
intellectual property rights shall be in writing
and shall state any relevant findings of fact and
the reasoning or the legal basis upon which the
decisions are based. Each Party shall also ensure
that such decisions or rulings shall be published75,
or otherwise made publicly available, in a
national language in such a manner as to enable
governments and interested persons to become
acquainted with them.]
[2.
Each Party shall notify the laws and regulations
referred to in [paragraph (1)][ Article 4.3] to
the Oversight Committee in order to assist that
Committee in its review of the operation of this
Agreement.]
3.
Each Party shall supply, in response to a written
request from another Party, information regarding
its laws, regulations, [procedures][ final
judicial decisions] and administrative rulings of
general application [respecting][ with respect
to] any matter covered by this Agreement.
4.
Nothing in paragraphs [1, 2 and 3][1 and 2] shall
require a Party to disclose {confidential}
information which would impede law enforcement or
otherwise be contrary to [domestic laws and
policies, or] the public interest or would
prejudice the legitimate commercial interests of
particular enterprises, public or private.
ARTICLE
5.5: CONSULTATION
Each
Party shall [accord sympathetic consideration to,
and shall] afford adequate opportunity for
consultation regarding, such representations as
may be made [to it] by another Party with respect
to any matter affecting the operation of this
Agreement.
[
ARTICLE 5.6: OBSERVERS
Countries
candidate to become a Party to the Agreement may
be invited [by the Committee] to attend sessions
or parts thereof of the Oversight Committee as
observers. An invitation under the same status
may be extended [by the Committee] to
international organizations active in the field
of intellectual property and to non-governmental
groups of intellectual property stake-holders]
CHAPTER SIX
FINAL PROVISIONS76
[ARTICLE
X : TRANSPARENCY
1.
Each Party shall ensure that its laws,
regulations, procedures, and administrative
rulings of general application respecting any
matter covered by this Agreement are promptly
published or otherwise made publicly available in
such a manner as to enable governments and
interested persons to become acquainted with
them.
2.
Each Party shall notify the laws and regulations
referred to in paragraph (1) to the Oversight
Committee in order to assist that Committee in
its review of the operation of this Agreement.
3.
Each Party shall supply, in response to a written
request from another Party, information regarding
its laws, regulations, procedures, and
administrative rulings of general application
respecting any matter covered by this Agreement.
4.
Nothing in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall require a
Party to disclose confidential information which
would impede law enforcement or otherwise be
contrary to the public interest or would
prejudice the legitimate commercial interests of
particular enterprises, public or private.]
ARTICLE
6.1: BECOMING PARTY TO THE AGREEMENT
1.
[ Any member of the [World Intellectual Property
Organisation] [World Trade Organization] [or the
World Trade Organization (WTO)] [or of the United
Nations] may become party to this Agreement.[
Decisions on accession shall be taken by the
Oversight Committee. The Oversight Committee
shall approve the agreement on the terms of
accession by [unanimity][a two-thirds majority of
the Parties]].
2.
Any Intergovernmental Organization which [the
Committee decides] meets the requirements of
paragraph 5 may become party to this Agreement.
The Organization shall inform the Depositary of
its competence [in respect of matters governed by
this Agreement], and any subsequent changes in
its competence, with respect to the matters
governed by this Agreement. The Organization and
its member States may, without, however, any
derogation from the obligations under this
Agreement, decide on their respective
responsibilities for the performance of their
obligations under this Agreement [without,
however, any derogation from the obligations
under this Agreement].
3.
A [State or Intergovernmental Organization][
member of any organization identified in
paragraph 1] may become party to this Agreement
by:
(a)
signature followed by the deposit of an
instrument of ratification, acceptance or
approval, or
(b)
the deposit of an instrument of accession.
4.
The instruments referred to in paragraph (3)
shall be deposited with the Depositary.
5.
In this Article, "Intergovernmental
Organization" means an organization
constituted by, and composed of, States of any
region of the world, which has competence in
respect of matters governed by this Agreement,
has its own legislation providing for
intellectual property protection and binding on
all its member States, and has been duly
authorized, in accordance with its internal
procedures, to sign, ratify, accept, approve or
accede to this Agreement.
ARTICLE
6.2: ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE AGREEMENT
1.
This Agreement shall enter into force, with
respect to each of the [first five States or
Intergovernmental Organizations] [[five] members
of either organization identified in Article
6.1.1] which have deposited their instruments of
ratification, acceptance, approval or accession,
[three months] [90 days] after the date on which
the [fifth] instrument of ratification,
acceptance, approval or accession has been
deposited.
2.
With respect to any [State or Intergovernmental
Organization][member of either organization
identified in Article 6.1.1] not covered by
paragraph (1), this Agreement shall enter into
force [three months][90 days] after the date on
which that [State of Intergovernmental
Organization][member of either organization
identified in Article 6.1.1] has deposited its
instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval
or accession.
ARTICLE
6.3: WITHDRAWAL
A
Party may withdraw from this Agreement by means
of a written notification to the Depositary. Such
withdrawal shall take effect [one year][six
months] after the notification was received by
the Depositary.
ARTICLE
6.4: AMENDMENTS
1.
[Any Party may initiate a proposal to amend the
provisions of this Agreement by submitting such
proposal [to the Oversight Committee]]. This
Agreement may be amended by the Parties on the
basis of a [previous] text adopted by the
[Oversight][ACTA][ Steering] Committee.[ Each
Party may propose amendments to the Agreement to
the Committee. The Committee shall decide upon
the proposed amendments by consensus.]
2.
The Parties shall deposit their respective
instruments of ratification, acceptance or
approval of any such amendment with the
Depositary.
3.
Such amendment shall enter into force on the
[first day of the third month following] [90 days
after the date of] [three months after the date
of] the deposit of the last of the instruments of
ratification, acceptance or approval of all the
Parties.
ARTICLE
6.5: TEXTS OF THE AGREEMENT
[This
Agreement is established in [a single original in
the][English][, French][, Spanish][, Arabic]
languages, all texts being equally authentic.]
[In case of any inconsistency between the texts,
the English version shall prevail.]
ARTICLE
6.6: DEPOSITARY
[Name
of [State][ entity]] shall be the Depositary of
this Agreement.
ARTICLE
6.7: SIGNATURE
This
Agreement shall be open for signature between
[date] and [date] with the [Government of]
.......... [the [country][entity]] that exercises
the functions of Depositary].
_____
Notes:
1
This Section A has been proposed as an initial
discussion draft, to receive detailed reactions
at the next Round.
2 Negotiator's Note: Provisions
on transitional arrangements (i.e., entry into
force) and application to prior acts will be
included in Chapter 6.
3 Section B of the Initial Provisions
is still to be discussed.
4 For greater certainty, "TRIPS
Agreement" includes any waiver in force
between the Parties of any provision of the TRIPS
Agreement granted by WTO Members in accordance
with the WTO Agreement.
5This General Obligations Section has
been proposed as an initial discussion draft, to
receive detailed reactions at the next Round.
6[Move (with adjustments) Art. 2.1.2
to General Obligations.]
[7 A Party may comply with its
obligation relating to exportation of infringing
goods through its provisions concerning
distribution [or transfer].]
[8 The conditions and procedures
relating to such injunction will be left to each
Party's legal system.]
9 At least one delegation opposes
paragraph 2 and is considering its placement
10At least one delegation proposes to
delete (ii) as originally proposed and move (ii)
into paragraph 2.2.1(b).
11 Such measures may include the
presumption that the amount of damages is (i) the
quantity of the goods infringing the right
holder's intellectual property right and actually
assigned to third persons, multiplied by the
amount of profit per unit of goods which would
have been sold by the right holder if there had
not been the act of infringement or (ii) a
reasonable royalty [ or (iii) a lump sum on the
basis of elements such as at least the amount of
royalties or fees which would have been due if
the infringer had requested authorization to use
the intellectual property right in question].
[12 No Party is required to apply
paragraph 2 to actions for infringement against a
Party or a third party acting with the
authorization or consent of the Party.]
[13 No Party is required to provide
the right holders with more than one of the
options referred to in paragraph 2.]
[14 For greater certainty, the term
"reasonable attorney's fees" is not
intended to require a higher amount than the
amount of "appropriate attorney's fees"
under the TRIPS Article 45.2.]
[15 For greater certainty, the term
"reasonable attorney's fees" is not
intended to require a higher amount than the
amount of "appropriate attorney's fees"
under the TRIPS Article 45.2.]
16 This provision is to be reflected
in the General Obligations Section.
17[Negotiators Note: Study
moving this clause to General Provisions section]
18At least one delegation raises issue
of scope of this provision.
19 Where a Party has dismantled
substantially all controls over movement of goods
across its border with another Party with which
it forms part of a customs union, it shall not be
required to apply the provisions of this Section
at that border.
[20 Each Party shall implement
the obligations in respect of importation and
exportation set out in this Section so as to be
applied to shipments of goods consigned to {a
local party/a party in the territory} but
destined for outside the territory of the Party].
21 No Party shall be obliged to apply
this section to any goods that do not infringe an
intellectual property right held within the
territory of that Party]. [Negotiator's
note: Study moving to General Provisions
section.]
[22 The provisions of this section
shall also apply to confusingly similar trademark
goods [ , which means any goods, including
packaging, bearing without authorization a
trademark that is similar to the trademark
validly registered in respect of such or similar
goods where there exists a likelihood of
confusion on the part of the public between the
trademark borne and the trademark validly
registered, and that thereby infringes the rights
of the owner of the trademark in question under
the law of the country in which the procedures
set out in this Section are invoked.]
23 For the purposes of this Section, in-transit
goods means goods under "Customs
transit" and under "transhipment".
"Customs transit" means the Customs
procedure under which goods are transported under
Customs control from one Customs office to
another. "Transhipment" means the
Customs procedure under which goods are
transferred under Customs control from the
importing means of transport to the exporting
means of transport within the area of one Customs
office which is the office of both importation
and exportation.]
[24For the purpose of this Section,
where the competent authorities suspend the
release of suspected counterfeit trademark or
pirated copyright goods, the authorities shall
not permit the goods to be released into free
circulation, exported, or subject to other
customs procedures, except in exceptional
circumstances.]
25 For purposes of this Section, counterfeit
trademark goods means any goods, including
packaging, bearing without authorization a
trademark that is identical to the trademark
validly registered in respect of such goods, or
that cannot be distinguished in its essential
aspects from such a trademark, and that thereby
infringes the rights of the owner of the
trademark in question under the law of the
country in which the procedures set out in this
Section are invoked.
[It is to be understood that there shall be no
obligation to apply such procedures to imports of
goods put on the market in another country by or
with the consent of the right holder.]
26 For purposes of this Section, pirated
copyright goods means any goods that are
copies made without the consent of the right
holder or person duly authorized by the right
holder in the country of production and that are
made directly or indirectly from an article where
the making of that copy would have constituted an
infringement of a copyright or a related right
under the law of the country in which the
procedures set out in this Section are invoked.
27Whether this applies to imports,
exports and/or in transit goods depends on
paragraph 1.
28Subject to scope.
29Subject to scope.
30Subject to scope.
31At least one delegation may come
back with a possible additional paragraph for
Article 2,12, depending upon the progress of
discussion in the Civil Enforcement Section.
32For purposes of the Article,
"days" shall mean "business
days".
33Subject to agreement by at least one
delegation.
34 Negotiator's Note: Definitions of
"counterfeit trademark goods" and
"pirated copyright goods" provided for
in footnotes 12 and 13 of Section 2 (Border
Measures) should be used as context for this
Section.
35This provision is under internal
examination by at least one delegation.
Subparagraphs (a) and (b) are still under
examination by at least one delegation. At least
one is still considering paragraphs 1 and 2.
36 Each Party shall treat willful
importation [or exportation] of counterfeit
trademark goods or pirated copyright goods on a
commercial scale [in accordance with its laws and
regulations,] as unlawful activities subject to
criminal penalties under this Article. A Party
may comply with its obligation relating to
[exportation] of pirated copyright or counterfeit
trademark goods through its measures concerning
distribution.
37For purposes of this Section,
financial gain includes the receipt or
expectation of receipt of anything of value.
38At least one delegation has asked
for the deletion of paragraph 3.
39At least one delegation opposes
paragraph 2, 'Inciting, Aiding and Abetting'.
40[It is understood that there is no
obligation to provide penalties of imprisonment
against legal persons for the crimes set forth in
Article 2.14.].
41[Negotiator's note: [It is
understood that there is no obligation for a
Party to impose both imprisonment and monetary
fines in parallel] [This does not imply an
obligation for a Party to provide for the courts
a possibility to impose both penalties in
parallel.]
42Each Party may provide that its
judicial authorities have the authority to order
[fines or] the seizure of assets the value of
which corresponds to that of such assets derived
from or obtained, directly or indirectly, through
the infringing activity.
43At least one delegation to propose
wording to clarify whether forfeiture to right
holder or to state.
44At least one delegation proposes
that this provision be reflected in the General
Provisions of the Agreement.
45At least one delegation reserves its
right to revisit elements of this Section at a
later date.
46[See identical comment on the draft
Chapter 2, Section 1 "Civil
Enforcement" and Section 3 "Criminal
Enforcement". A suggestion is to move these
provisions into Chapter 1, Section A which
applies to the whole Agreement. Direct reference
to TRIPS might also clarify the scope of these
obligations.]
47[For greater certainty, the Parties
understand that third party liability means
liability for any person who authorizes for a
direct financial benefit, induces through or by
conduct directed to promoting infringement, or
knowingly and materially aids any act of
copyright or related rights infringement by
another. Further, the Parties also understand
that the application of third party liability may
include consideration of exceptions or
limitations to exclusive rights that are confined
to certain special cases that do not conflict
with a normal exploitation of the work,
performance or phonogram, and do not unreasonably
prejudice the legitimate interests of the right
holder, including fair use, fair dealing, or
their equivalents.] At least one delegation
opposes this footnote.
48 Negotiator's Note: This
provision may be moved and located in the civil
enforcement section.
49 Negotiator's Note:
Definition of person still pending in General
Provisions.
50[For purposes of this Article, online
service provider and provider mean a
provider of online services or network access, or
the operators of facilities therefore, and
includes an entity offering the transmission,
routing, or providing of connections for digital
online communications, between or among points
specified by a user, of material of the user's
choosing, without modification to the content of
the material as sent or received.]
51At least one delegation suggests
moving the second and third sentences of
paragraph 3. At least one delegation suggests
moving the first and second sentences of
paragraph 3.
52For greater certainty, the Parties
understand that [these limitations are not
intended to harmonize the liability of online
service provider, but exclude liability in
certain situations. Thus] the failure of an
online service provider's conduct to qualify for
a limitation of liability under its measures
implementing this provision shall not bear
adversely upon the consideration of a defense by
the provider that the provider's conduct is not
infringing or any other defense.
53Clarify which conditions apply to
which activities.
54 [Negotiator's Note:
Definition of "person" still pending in
General Provisions.]
[55 For purposes of this Article, online
service provider and provider mean a
provider of online services or network access, or
the operators of facilities therefore, and
includes an entity offering the transmission,
routing, or providing of connections for digital
online communications, between or among points
specified by a user, of material of the user's
choosing, without modification to the content of
the material as sent or received.]
[56 The activities covered in
paragraph 3(a)(i) cover the mere conduit and the
activities covered in paragraph 3(a)(ii) and
(iii) cover respectively caching and hosting in
accordance with parties legal systems.]
57At least one delegation proposes to
redraft this sub-paragraph.
58At least one delegation proposes to
include language in this footnote to provide
greater certainty that their existing national
law complies with this requirement.
59At least one delegation has
reservations about several elements in paragraph
4.
60At least one delegation opposes
inclusion of 'adequate legal protection'.
61At least one delegation opposes
inclusion of 'or owner of an exclusive license'.
62[For the purpose of this Article,
willful conduct means actual knowledge or
reasonable grounds to know that he or she is
pursuing the objective of circumventing any
effective technological measure.]
63At least one delegation opposes
inclusion of 'adequate legal protection'.
64 For the purposes of this Article,
effective technological measure means any
technology, device, or component that, in the
normal course of its operation, [controls access
to a protected work, performance, phonogram, or
protects any copyright or any rights related to
copyrights.][is controlled by the right holders
through application of an access control or
protection process such as encryption,
scrambling, or other transformation of their
works, performances or phonograms, or a copy
control mechanism, which achieves the protection
objective.]
65[The] [In accordance with the
applicable national legislation, the] obligations
in paragraphs (4) and (5) [are][may be] without
prejudice to the rights, limitations, exceptions,
or defenses to copyright or related rights
infringement. Further, [in implementing paragraph
(4), no Party may][paragraph (4) does not imply
any obligation to] require that the design of, or
the design and selection of parts and components
for, a consumer electronics, telecommunications,
or computing product provide for a response to
any particular technological measure, so long as
the product does not otherwise violate any
measures implementing paragraph (4).
66At least one delegation is to
reflect on appropriate location for this
provision.
67Negotiator's Note: This provision is
subject to broader government action/sovereign
immunity provision elsewhere in the Agreement.
68[For the purpose of this Article,
willful conduct means knowingly performing
without authority any of the following acts
listed under subparagraph 6 (a) or (b), if such
person knows or has reasonable grounds to know
that by so doing he is inducing, enabling,
facilitating, or concealing an infringement of
any copyright or any rights related to
copyright.]
69For purposes of this Article,
[electronic] rights management information means:
(a) information that identifies a work, [or other
subject matters specified under Article 14 of the
TRIPS Agreement] [performance, or phonogram]; the
author [of the work, the performer of the
performance, or the producer of the phonogram]
[or any other right holders of the subject
matters specified under Article 14 of the TRIPS
Agreement]; or the owner of any right in the
work, performance, or phonogram; (b) information
about the terms and conditions of the use of the
work, [performance, or phonogram] [or any other
right holders of the subject matters specified
under Article 14 of the TRIPS Agreement]; or (c)
any numbers or codes that represent the
information described in (a) or (b) above,when
any of these items is attached to a copy of the
work, [performance, or phonogram] [or other
subject matters specified under Article 14 of the
TRIPS Agreement] or appears in connection with
the communicator or making available of a work,
[performance, or phonogram] [or other subject
matters specified under Article 14 of the TRIPS
Agreement] to the public.
70[Article 4.2 should be reviewed in
relation to other proposal on Chapter 2 regarding
Information Exchange between Customs
Authorities.]
71 [For greater certainty, a Party may
satisfy the requirement in [Article 5.3] to
publish a measure by making it available to the
public on the Internet.]
72[For greater certainty, nothing in
[this sub-paragraph] is intended to prescribe the
type, format, and method of publication of the
information a Party must publicize.]
73At least one delegation reserves its
right to revisit elements of this chapter at a
later date.
74 The application of this provision
shall not conflict with the rules and
implementation of the Dispute Settlement
Understanding of the World Trade Organization.
75 [For greater certainty, a Party may
satisfy the requirement in [Article 5.3] to
publish a measure by making it available to the
public on a publically accessible Internet site.]
76At least one delegation reserves its
right to revisit elements of this chapter at a
later date.
|